This report details the distribution of regulatory
costs for five major sectors of the U.S. economy:
manufacturing, trade (wholesale and retail), services,
health care, and other (a residual category containing
all enterprises not included in the other four). The
sector-specific findings reveal that the disproportionate
cost burden on small firms is particularly stark
for the manufacturing sector. The compliance cost
per employee for small manufacturers is at least double
the compliance cost for medium-sized and large
firms. In the service sector, regulatory costs differ
little from small to larger firms.
The disproportionality of the burden borne by
small firms, identified in previous Advocacy studies,
is further validated in this instance. On a peremployee
basis, it costs about $2,400, or 45 percent,
more for small firms to comply than their larger
counterparts. The 2001 study, using a slightly different
methodology, concluded that the disproportionality
rate was higher—nearly 60 percent.
Environmental and tax compliance regulations
appear to be the main cost drivers in determining
the severity of the disproportionate impact on small
firms. Compliance with environmental regulations
costs 364 percent more in small firms than in large
firms. The cost of tax compliance is 67 percent
higher in small firms than the cost in large firms. In
the aggregate estimates for all sectors, the cost per
employee of economic regulations falls most heavily
on large firms. The cost per employee of workplace
regulations falls most heavily on medium-sized firms.