Quantcast

Crispus Attucks

Defending Legitimate Epidemiologic Research: Combating Lysenko Pseudoscience

Written By: James E Enstrom
Published In: Analytic Perspective
Publication date: 10/10/2007
Publisher: BioMedCentral

This analysis presents a detailed defense of my epidemiologic research in the May 17, 2003 British Medical Journal that found no significant relationship between environmental tobacco smoke (ETS) and tobacco-related mortality. In order to defend the honesty and scientific integrity of my research, I have identified and addressed in a detailed manner several unethical and erroneous attacks on this research. Specifically, I have demonstrated that this research is not "fatally flawed," that I have not made "inappropriate use" of the underlying database, and that my findings agree with other United States results on this relationship. My research suggests, contrary to popular claims, that there is not a causal relationship between ETS and mortality in the U.S. responsible for 50,000 excess annual deaths, but rather there is a weak and inconsistent relationship. The popular claims tend to damage the credibility of epidemiology.


See more articles by James E Enstrom
Post a comment:
Email will not be displayed, distributed or sold to third parties
Verify the text in the image