Quantcast

Crispus Attucks

Cut Sugar Subsidy, Don't Add A Tax

Letter to the Editor: The Wall Street Journal

Written By: John Nothdurft
Published In: Letters to the Editor > May 2009
Publication date: 05/23/2009
Publisher: The Heartland Institute

The call by "health advocates" for a new federal "sin tax" on sugary drinks is yet another example of special interests trying to use shoddy social-engineering tax policy to grow the size of government ("Soda Tax Weighed to Pay for Health Care," U.S. News, May 12). The expansion of such taxes to every product health officials deem "harmful" is a continuation down the slippery slope. Where will it end?

It is simply wrong to use tax policy to discriminate against users of certain legal products, distorting a market already rich with both sugar-filled and sugar-free drink options.

John Nothdurft
The Heartland Institute
Chicago

This letter to the editor was originally published in The Wall Street Journal.

Post a comment:
Email will not be displayed, distributed or sold to third parties
Verify the text in the image