Skip Navigation

A Scientific Critique of EPA’s Proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants [NESHAP] Rule

October 13, 2017

The EPA fails to describe the scientific reality of natural processes that govern the cycling of Mercury in newly proposed National Emission Standards.

Click here for the report

From the Summary of Findings: The Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA’s) newly proposed National Emission Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants (NESHAP) failed to describe the scientific reality of natural processes and multi-factorial controls that govern the cycling of mercury (Hg) and the ultimate biomethylation and bioaccumulation processes for methylmercury (MeHg).

As this report documents, this natural cycle has been taking place for at least the last 650,000 years. EPA’s  proposed  NESHAP  provides  no  detectable beneficial outcomes in the control of mercury emissions (even accepting EPA’s own risk-benefit analysis without a challenge). The new rules will result in a major economic impact, harm American public health by creating exaggerated and unfounded fears about  eating fish that are beneficial in everyone’s diet, and further degrade the essential role of science in informing  public policy.

Author
This bio and account of the work of Willie Soon debunks lies of the generously funded environmental left’s attacks on an honest climate scientist.
media@heartland.org