Policy Documents

Research & Commentary: Pennsylvania Medicaid Expansion

February 19, 2013

As states implement the federal health care law, many are debating whether to expand their Medicaid programs in order to receive a larger federal subsidy. Gov. Tom Corbett recently announced his opposition to expanding Medicaid, noting the system’s already high costs and need for reform.

 If Pennsylvania expands its Medicaid program to individuals at 100 to 138 percent of the federal poverty level, the federal government will provide 100 percent of the additional money for 2014–16, 95 percent in 2017, 94 percent in 2018, 93 percent in 2019, and 90 percent in 2020 and beyond. Expansion proponents argue it would be unwise to reject this “free money” and they say expansion will provide insurance coverage for more Pennsylvanians.

Opponents, however, note expansion will lock in even larger Medicaid costs without improving the quality of care. According to federal government statistics from 2009, more than 18 percent of Pennsylvania’s population already depends on the health care entitlement program, and the Kaiser Family Foundation found expansion would increase enrollment by 21.7 percent by 2019.

In 2010, Pennsylvania spent more than $18 billion on Medicaid. According to Corbett, that figure will increase by $4.1 billion through the 2020–21 fiscal year. That would happen because the federal matching rate applies only to newly eligible Medicaid enrollees. Pennsylvania residents who are already eligible but have not enrolled will be forced to do so because of the individual mandate in the federal health care law, and the state will have to bear the cost of those additional enrollees.

Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Avik Roy notes a report from The University of Virginia found “Medicaid patients were almost twice as likely to die as those with private insurance; their hospital stays were 42% longer, and cost 26% more. Compared to those without health insurance, Medicaid patients were 13% more likely to die, stayed in the hospital for 50% longer, and cost 20% more. It is hard to see how this problem doesn’t get significantly worse when Obamacare’s expansion of Medicaid is fully phased in.”

Instead of expanding a program that already provides inferior health care, Pennsylvanians would be physically and fiscally better off rejecting the “free money” and finding alternative ways to expand health care access.

The following documents offer additional information about Medicaid expansion.

Pennsylvania Medicaid Statistics
The federal government’s Medicaid Web site offers insight into Pennsylvania’s financial contributions to the health care entitlement program. 

Pennsylvania: Medicaid and CHIP
The Kaiser Family Foundation estimates increased enrollment in Pennsylvania’s Medicaid program after expansion, as well as previous financial contributions to the system. 

Corbett Bristles at Medicaid Expansion Criticism
A local news outlet outlines Pennsylvania Gov. Tom Corbett’s opposition to Medicaid expansion and its projected fiscal consequences for the state. 

UVa Study: Surgical Patients on Medicaid Are 13% More Likely to Die than Those Without Insurance
Manhattan Institute Senior Fellow Avik Roy writes about a University of Virginia report that finds it is better for your health to be uninsured than a Medicaid beneficiary. 

Research & Commentary: States Should Avoid Medicaid Expansion
Kendall Antekeier of The Heartland Institute explains the Supreme Court ruling on Medicaid expansion. “States should think twice about giving up more control of their Medicaid programs only to further expand a system that is already fiscally unsustainable,” she writes. 

Ten Principles of Health Care Policy
This pamphlet in The Heartland Institute’s Legislative Principles series describes the proper role of government in financing and delivering health care and provides reform suggestions to remedy current health care policy problems.

Medicaid: To Expand or Not To Expand
Nicole Kaeding of Americans for Prosperity argues states should avoid expanding their Medicaid programs because doing so would support the flawed and expensive federal health care law, place heavy financial burdens on the state, and expand an already-broken system. 

The End of Federalism: How Obamacare Will Impact States
This brief fact sheet from The Heritage Foundation outlines the consequences of expanding Medicaid programs to meet federal requirements.

Nothing in this Research & Commentary is intended to influence the passage of legislation, and it does not necessarily represent the views of The Heartland Institute. For further information on this subject, visit Health Care News at http://news.heartland.org/health, The Heartland Institute’s Website at http://heartland.org, and PolicyBot, Heartland’s free online research database at www.policybot.org.

If you have any questions about this issue or the Heartland Web site, contact Heartland Institute Government Relations Director John Nothdurft at jnothdurft@heartland.org or 312/377-4000.