NIPCC vs. IPCC
Addressing the disparity between climate models and observations: Testing the hypothesis of anthropogenic global warming (AGW)
Written by S. Fred Singer, Ph.D., this report updates the Nongovernmental International Panel on Climate Change (NIPCC) report titled Nature, Not Human Activity, Rules the Climate (published in 2008) and contains new results:
1. It defends NIPCC against false claims that IPCC climate models are "consistent" with observed temperature trends. The central issues I the cause of global warming: Is it natural or is it manmade? This issue is of crucial importance for both climate science and climate policy.
2. It demonstrates that because of their chaotic character none of IPCC's climate models can be validated against observations and used to predict future temperatures.
3. It presents new thinking on Climategate and the hockeystick graph, and provides evidence against the claimed surface warming underlying the IPCC conclusion of AGW. Is the reported 1979-1997 warming real?