Research & Commentary: New Jersey Bills Undermine Tobacco Harm Reduction, Will Create Unintended Consequences
A slew of legislation aim to regulate and ban the sales of flavored e-cigarettes and menthol combustible cigarettes, as well as impose additional taxes on these products.
In an effort to combat youth e-cigarette use, lawmakers in the Garden State are threatening to eliminate tobacco harm reduction options for adults. A slew of legislation has moved forward, all of which aim to regulate and ban the sales of flavored e-cigarettes and menthol combustible cigarettes, as well as impose additional taxes on these products.
A3178 would ban the sales of flavored electronic cigarettes and vaping devices, as well as prohibit the sales of menthol-flavored combustible cigarettes. S3265 would ban the sales of flavored e-cigarettes and does not include menthol tobacco cigarettes.
S4223 “revises licensure” for vaping businesses. Current law only requires a license to sell nicotine liquid. However, S4223 would “require licensure as a condition of selling” any e-cigarette and vaping device. Further, only retailers “that derive 50 percent of retail sales from vapor products may be licensed as a vapor business.” Essentially, the bill would prohibit e-cigarettes sales in convenience stores and allow only brick-and-mortar vape shops to sell such products.
A5922 would increase the fine for selling e-cigarettes and tobacco products to minors. Currently, persons guilty of selling tobacco and vaping products to minors are subject to a $250 fine for the first offense and $500 for the second, third, and subsequent offenses. A5922 would increase this fine to “$500 for a first offense, $1,000 for a second offense, and $2,000 for a third or subsequent offense.” A5922 would also require retailers to install electronic age verification systems.
Further, A5922 would require all vaping products sold in the state to be registered with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). The bill would also limit the amount of nicotine in vaping products to 2 percent, or 20 milligrams per milliliter. Lastly, vaping products “that are designed to mimic the appearance of another object” would be prohibited from sale in New Jersey, under the bill.
Similar to S4223, A5923 revises vaping licenses and would create two different types of licenses for vaping products: “basic vapor licenses for entities seeking to sell electronic smoking devices and liquid nicotine cartridges, and plenary vapor business licenses for entities seeking to sell non-cartridge vaping liquid.” Plenary vapor business license holders would also be required to obtain a basic vapor license.
A5923 would also increase the tax on vaping products. Currently, New Jersey imposes a tax of $0.10 per fluid milliliter and a 10 percent wholesale tax on the retail price of non-cartridge vaping e-liquid. This bill would increase those to $0.20 and 20 percent of retail sale price, respectively. Further, the bill would also “assess a new 20 percent tax on the retail sale price of electronic smoking devices.”
Overwhelmingly, lawmakers are using this slew of legislation to address youth e-cigarette use. Rep. Herb Conaway (D-Burlington), who has sponsored several anti-vaping bills, declared e-cigarettes “that are flavored are designed to attract and addict kids. That’s the bottom line.”
Although addressing youth e-cigarettes is laudable, lawmakers should refrain from enacting policies that limit tobacco harm reduction options for adults. E-cigarettes and vaping devices are tobacco harm reduction tools that have helped an estimated three million American adults quit combustible cigarettes. Moreover, flavor bans and taxes are ineffective measures to reduce youth e-cigarette use and are more likely to causes former smokers to return to combustible cigarettes while creating black markets.
The Heartland Institute analyzed results from the 2017-18 California Youth Tobacco Survey (CYTS) and found despite flavor restrictions in some localities, youth use of e-cigarettes in those areas increased after the bans went into place.
Santa Clara County, California, banned flavored tobacco product sales to age-restricted stores in 2014. Despite this, youth e-cigarette use increased while the ban was in effect. For example, in the 2015-16 CYTS, 7.5 percent of Santa Clara high school students reported current use of e-cigarettes. In the 2017-18 CYTS, this increased to 10.7 percent.
Another Heartland analysis examined the effects of Pennsylvania’s 40 percent wholesale tax, which went into effect in 2016. The analysis noted in 2015, 27 percent of Pennsylvania 12th graders used an e-cigarette. This increased to 29.3 percent in 2017.
Lawmakers should note flavors are important in both e-cigarette initiation and their continued use. Indeed, a 2018 survey of nearly 70,000 American adults noted 83.2 percent and 72.3 percent of survey respondents reported vaping fruit and dessert flavors, respectively. Further, only 20 percent of respondents reported using tobacco flavors at point of e-cigarette initiation.
Given the significance of flavors for adults, bans on flavors will actually reduce adult use of e-cigarettes. For example, a 2017 study by the National Bureau of Economic Research determined banning flavors in e-cigarettes “would result in the increased choice of combustible cigarettes.” Indeed, the authors estimated e-cigarette use would decrease by approximately 10 percent if flavors are banned.
A ban on menthol cigarettes will also produce a plethora of unintended consequences. Although white Americans smoke more menthol cigarettes than African Americans, “black smokers [are] 10-11 times more likely to smoke” menthol cigarettes than white smokers. Bans on menthol cigarettes could lead to racial repercussions. This sentiment was expressed in a recent letter from the mothers of Eric Garner and Trayvon Martin to the New York City council, who are debating a ban on menthol cigarettes.” In their letter, they implored lawmakers to “pay very close attention to the unintended consequences of a ban on menthol cigarettes and what it would mean for communities of color.”
Although lawmakers are concerned about youth e-cigarette use, New Jersey retailers have actually sold more cigarettes and cigars to minors than e-cigarettes. From September 1, 2018 to August 31, 2019, FDA conducted 4,667 tobacco product compliance checks on retailers in New Jersey. Of these, only 543, or 11.6 percent involved sales to minors. Of the 543 sales to minors, only 95, or 17 percent, involved sales of electronic cigarette and vaping devices. Surprisingly, retailers were in violation of selling larger amounts of other tobacco products to minors, with cigarettes comprising 54 percent of minor sales with 297 violations, and cigars consisting of 137 violations, or 25 percent of sales to minors.
If lawmakers in New Jersey truly want to address youth e-cigarette use, they should allocate more tobacco moneys to tobacco control programs. In 2019, the Garden State received an estimated $919.6 million in revenue from tobacco settlement payments and taxes. That year, New Jersey allocated only $7.2 million, or 0.007 percent, on tobacco education and prevention programs.
Rather than vaporizing tobacco harm reduction options for adults, New Jersey policymakers should promote e-cigarettes as tools that help smokers quit. Flavors are integral to their efficacy as a cessation device. Further, lawmakers should invest more money into tobacco control programs, if they truly wish to reduce youth e-cigarette use.
The following documents provide more information on e-cigarettes and tobacco harm reduction.
Tobacco Harm Reduction 101: A Guidebook for Policymakers
This booklet from The Heartland Institute aims to inform key stakeholders on the much-needed information on the benefits of electronic cigarettes and vaping devices. Tobacco Harm Reduction 101 details the history of e-cigarettes, including regulatory actions on these products. The booklet also explains the role of nicotine, addresses tax policy and debunks many of the myths associated with e-cigarettes, including assertions about “popcorn lung,” formaldehyde, and the so-called youth vaping epidemic.
Podcast Series: Voices of Vapers
In this weekly podcast series, State Government Relations Manager Lindsey Stroud talks with researchers, advocates, and policymakers about tobacco harm reduction and electronic cigarettes. The series provides important information about the thousands of entrepreneurs who have started small businesses thanks to THRs and the millions of adults that have used electronic cigarettes and vaping devices to quit smoking tobacco cigarettes.
Vaping, E-Cigarettes, and Public Policy Toward Alternatives to Smoking
For decades, lawmakers and regulators have used taxes, bans, and burdensome regulations as part of their attempt to reduce the negative health effects of smoking. Recently, some have sought to extend those policies to electronic cigarettes. This booklet from The Heartland Institute urges policymakers to re-think that tax-and-regulate strategy. Policymakers should be mindful of the extensive research that supports tobacco harm reduction and understand bans, excessive regulations, and high taxes on e-cigarettes often encourage smokers to continue using more-harmful traditional cigarette products.
Testimony Before the New Jersey Governor’s Electronic Smoking Device Task Force Regarding Adult Use of Electronic Cigarettes and Vaping Devices
In this testimony from The Heartland Institute, State Government Relations Manager Lindsey Stroud provides the New Jersey Governor’s Electronic Smoking Device Task Force with a primer on e-cigarettes and tobacco harm reduction. Stroud examines the evidence of e-cigarettes being regulated by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, surveys claims by numerous public health agencies finding e-cigarettes to be significantly less harmful than combustible cigarettes, and analyzes the role of flavors and recent vaping-related hospitalizations. Lastly, Stroud debunks bogus claims of formaldehyde and popcorn lung.
Research & Commentary: Largest Vaping Survey Finds Flavors Play Important Role in Tobacco Harm Reduction
In this Research & Commentary, Heartland State Government Relations Manager Lindsey Stroud examines a survey of nearly 70,000 adult vapers in the United States. The survey was completed in response to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s recent Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking seeking comment on the role of flavors in tobacco products. The authors found nearly 95 percent of survey respondents were at one time smokers and the majority reported using flavors at the point of e-cigarette initiation. Stroud compares this to other surveys. She concludes, “eliminating flavors will force [vapers] to vape only tobacco-flavored e-cigarettes, which would likely cause them to return to combustible cigarettes.” Stroud also found research has found e-cigarettes are a key tobacco harm reduction product and could help alleviate state budgets by mitigating health care costs.
Research & Commentary: Flavor Bans Do Not Reduce Youth E-Cigarette Use
In this Research & Commentary, State Government Relations Manager Lindsey Stroud examines the California Youth Tobacco Survey results from 2017-18, finding youth vaping has increased in several California localities that have restricted access to flavored tobacco product. Stroud finds youth vaping has increased in both Santa Clara and Contra Costa counties. Stroud also notes that banning flavored e-cigarettes is likely to reduce the number of adult smokers switching from combustible cigarettes to tobacco harm reduction devices, and could lead former smokers back to cigarettes.
Research & Commentary: New CDC Report Finds Vaping Helps Smokers Quit
A new report released by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) found only 0.4 percent of the people who had never smoked tobacco in a CDC study group are current vapers, which the report defines as using a vaping device either every day or some days. The CDC report, the first of its kind, estimates e-cigarette use among U.S. adults using a nationally representative household survey. The report’s findings claim only 3.4 of adults who have never smoked have tried an e-cigarette; 12.6 percent of Americans have tried an e-cigarette; and fewer than 4 percent of the U.S. population are regular e-cigarette users.
Nothing in this Research & Commentary is intended to influence the passage of legislation, and it does not necessarily represent the views of The Heartland Institute. For further information on this and other topics, visit the Budget & Tax News website, The Heartland Institute’s website, our Consumer Freedom Lounge, and PolicyBot, Heartland’s free online research database.
The Heartland Institute can send an expert to your state to testify or brief your caucus; host an event in your state; or send you further information on a topic. Please don’t hesitate to contact us if we can be of assistance! If you have any questions or comments, contact Heartland’s government relations department, at firstname.lastname@example.org or 312/377-4000.