Skip Navigation

Transportation

Taxes
June 13, 2017
California Gas-Tax-Hike Repeal Campaign Heats Up
As a ballot initiative calling for repeal of a big gas-tax hike gains momentum in California, Gov. Jerry Brown (D) criticized the campaign, calling its supporters “freeloaders.”
Transportation
June 12, 2017
Louisiana Ridesharing Bill Hits Dead End in Senate Committees
The Louisiana Senate Judiciary Committee tabled a bill that would standardize the state’s transportation regulations on peer-to-peer economy transportation network companies (TNCs), such as Lyft and Uber.
Government Spending
June 12, 2017
President Trump Releases First Full Budget Proposal
President Donald Trump’s proposed budget for Fiscal Year 2018, which begins on October 1, would eliminate funding for 66 federal agencies or programs, including the Corporation for Public Broadcasting and the National Endowment for the Arts.
More News
Transportation
May 22, 2017
California Imposes Big Gas Tax Hike
Californians will pay more at the fuel pump this fall, after Gov. Jerry Brown (D) signed a gasoline tax hike into law in late April to fund new road construction.
Transportation
May 17, 2017
Alabama Considers Raising Gas Tax
Shortly after Alabama state Rep. Bill Poole (R-Tuscaloosa) pulled his bill to increase the state’s gas tax by 6 cents over the next five years, state Sen. Arthur Orr (R-Decatur) proposed another bill that would raise the state’s motor-fuel tax.
Transportation
April 21, 2017
Mobile, Alabama Lawmakers Uber Mad Over State Ridesharing Bill
The Mobile, Alabama City Council passed a resolution opposing a state lawmaker’s proposal to standardize government licensing regulations on peer-to-peer transportation network companies (TNC) such as Uber and Lyft.
 

The Issue

Throughout the United States, concern is being raised over the deteriorating condition of the nation's roads and bridges. High-quality roads are essential for safe and fast commuting, the transport of freight, and the delivery of goods. Yet years of deferred maintenance, politicization of investment decisions, and diversion to other uses of funds raised for roads have resulted in declining road conditions and rising congestion.

Gasoline taxes are an ineffective, regressive tax which has increasingly left transportation systems shortchanged. In recent years, the rise of fuel-efficient cars has decreased motor-fuel tax coffers and disproportionately shifted the burden to low-income drivers, a group that typically owns older, less fuel-efficient vehicles.

Gas taxes also disproportionately shift the burden to low-income drivers, a group that typically owns older, less fuel-efficient vehicles. According to Americans for Prosperity, households with incomes of less than $50,000 per year currently spend more than 20 percent of their after-tax income on energy. Although gas prices are comparatively low today, there are no assurances they will remain this way, whereas the gas tax hike would be permanent.

The fact gas taxes have not increased over time does not mean they need to be increased now. Gas taxes are a regressive tax hike which Wendell Cox and Ronald Utt argue has a stronger effect on lower- and middle-income families than it does on the wealthy. The tax could also cause low-income families to drive less, which could reduce employment options. Americans for Prosperity estimates lower gas prices amount to approximately $100 in additional spendable income per month for an average family, which means the recent nationwide drop in gas prices could potentially lead to an additional $100 billion of economic growth.

Our Stance

In The Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith argues when infrastructure is constructed and maintained using user fees and decentralized, new construction occurs only when market demand justifies it. Legislators should take a look at the inflated cost of public construction projects in their states before they allow any tax or fee hikes.

One option states should consider are public private partnerships (P3). P3s are a contract agreement between a public sector authority and a private party under which the private company provides a public service or project while taking on a substantial portion of the risk involved with the project. Transportation P3s offer several advantages, including improved access to capital, flexibility and improved innovation.

Featured Subtopics

A new car dealership lot
Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards were originally adopted out of fear of depleting fossil fuel reserves, then fear of dependency on OPEC for oil, and most recently justified based on fear of man-made global warming.
Roadway under construction with equipment
Public-private partnerships (P3) allow private companies to undertake construction or management of infrastructure projects while keeping the public sector accountable.
Two men in a car together
Imposing burdensome regulations on ridesharing providers would suppress competition, increase cronyism, and reduce access to transportation options that are reliable, safe, and affordable. Instead of increasing regulations on the rideshare industry, policymakers should consider reforming and removing regulations from traditional taxicab services that make them less competitive.

Additional Subtopics

  • Amtrak
  • Cars and Trucks
  • Congestion
  • Driverless Cars
  • Electric Vehicles
  • Federal Aid
  • Gas Tax
  • High Speed Rail
  • Public Transit
  • Roads
  • Safety
  • Taxicabs
  • Toll Roads

Videos

Title: Randall O'Toole, P9
Description: The future of transportation.

Transportation Experts Team

The Heartland Institute's experts on transportation policy issues are available for legislative testimony, speaking engagements, and media interviews.

Staff & Fellows Policy Experts